Skip to content

The Last Word

A Diversion for Lawyers and Others

  • Home
  • About

Categories

  • Alienation of Affection (18)
  • Arbitration (143)
  • Books of Interest (130)
  • Civil Procedure (162)
  • Condonation of Delay (50)
  • Conflicting Statutes (156)
  • Consumer Law (90)
  • Contract Law (235)
  • Corporate Law (64)
  • Criminal Law (500)
  • Doctrines (433)
  • Election Law (31)
  • Entertainment Features (220)
  • Family Law (88)
  • Gambling Law (13)
  • Intellectual Property Law (82)
  • Judges, Judgments & Lawyers (1,043)
  • Labour Law (143)
  • Law & Science (174)
  • Law of Writs (103)
  • Limitation Law (63)
  • Nature of Judicial Power (522)
  • Negotiable Instruments (38)
  • Phrases (646)
  • Poems, Scripts (170)
  • Primacy of Views (235)
  • Property Law (40)
  • Referred to Larger Bench (128)
  • Special Jurisdictions/Jurisprudence (417)
  • Statutory Interpretation (401)
  • X Supreme Court X (1,549)

Recent Posts

  • Random Collectibles, Transformative
  • Apples and Oranges
  • Sparring for an Opening
  • Section 12(5) of The Arbitration Act VI
  • Architectural, Not Episodic
  • Tabulated Charts
  • Train No. 2102, Jnaneshwari Express
  • The Contra Proferentem Rule VIII
  • The Nature of Judicial Power: One Battle After Another
  • Dilatory Arbitrators
  • Transgender Protection Cell / The Revival of Ray XCVIII
  • Suit Battle
  • Section 138 Notice II
  • How to be a Supreme but not Infallible Supreme Court Judge
  • Dr. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti
  • Leakage of Question Paper of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination
  • Intentionally, Voluntarily
  • The Baishakhi Principle
  • Consequential or Inconsequential Import
  • Women Officers
  • Where Eagles Dare
  • Dilly-Dally
  • Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts XV : Custodial Violence II
  • Ratio Decidendi IV
  • Spill the Beans

Archives

Top Posts & Pages

  • Order 18, Rule 17 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • Order 6, Rule 16 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • The Baazigar Suicide Letter
  • Boris and Barbara
  • Order 7, Rule 10-A of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • The Contra Proferentem Rule VIII
  • Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum

Blog Stats

  • 369,148

Enter your Email Address!

Arbitration

The Rare Case Where Section 42 of the Arbitration Act Fails

In the year 2000, the State of Maharashtra awarded a contract for some construction work to Atlanta Limited. Disputes borne out of the contract were to be decided through Arbitration. Recourse to a Court against an Arbitral Award may be made only by an application for setting aside such Award in accordance with Sub-Section (2) […]

Read more "The Rare Case Where Section 42 of the Arbitration Act Fails"

Public Policy and Foreign Arbitral Awards

In India, the true import of the phrase ‘public policy’ was, at first, put to question in relation to The Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 23 reads as: “The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless the Court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.” In 1959, in Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas […]

Read more "Public Policy and Foreign Arbitral Awards"

Section 11 of the Arbitration Act I

The nature and scope of jurisdiction of the Chief Justice or his Designate, under Section 11 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been expounded upon by many. SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd., (2005) 8 SCC 618 has put beyond doubt, the Chief Justice, in performance of its role espoused by Section […]

Read more "Section 11 of the Arbitration Act I"

Posts navigation

Newer posts →
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Last Word
    • Join 105 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Last Word
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar