State of Kerala v. V.R. Kalliyanikutty, (1999) 3 SCC 657 did not dispute, a statute of limitation only bars a remedy and does not extinguish a debt. It would also be apposite to point out, recently, K.C. Ninan v. Kerala State Electricity Board, 2023 INSC 560 noticed V.R. Kalliyanikutty and concluded, a statute of limitation […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXVII: Limitation and Debt"Chief Justice Sabyasachi Mukharji in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India, (1990) 1 SCC 613 felicitously described, “Principles of Natural Justice are fundamental… no man or no man’s right should be affected without an opportunity to ventilate his views… we are also conscious, justice is a psychological yearning.” This echoes what Lord Megarry said […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXVI: Principles of Natural Justice X"Duality of Sir Amitabh in Shahenshah, (1998) as a Corrupt-Comic Police Officer and a Costumed Crime-Buster compelled many to wonder, what did Sir Amitabh do with his illegal gratifications? No matter what you answer, acceptance of those gratifications were without law. Court has not refrained from reconsidering a prior construction, if it proves to be […]
Read more "Illegal Gratification IV"High Court is constitutionally independent and not subordinate to Supreme Court. _____ We do not live in an ideal world. Constitution Bench of Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company, (1983) 1 SCC 147 held, “We have serious reservations on whether it is open to a Court to answer academic or hypothetical questions. We think it is inexpedient […]
Read more "The Nature of Judicial Power: Asian Resurfacing"Registrar: “Curative Petitions filed were heard and disposed of in an Open Court. In this regard, Rule 2(1), Order XLVIII, S.C.R., 2O13 reads: Petitioner, in Curative Petition, shall aver specifically, grounds mentioned therein had been taken in Review Petition and it was dismissed by circulation. Since aforesaid Review Petitions were disposed of in an Open […]
Read more "Curative Jurisprudence"Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Institute for Physically Handicapped called for appointment of Primary School Teachers and reserved a right to evaluate, review its process of selection at any stage. This one is a classic case of arbitrary action. While primary duty of Constitutional Courts remains control of power, including setting aside of illegal or arbitrary actions, such […]
Read more "The Rules of The Game Principle X"The fear of reprisal and vindictiveness does not evaporate. The so-called protection exists only on paper. – Hon’ble Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India, [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 880 of 2017]. Constitution guarantees a right to informational privacy of political affiliation. Can such right be extended to contributions to political […]
Read more "Deep Association of Money and Politics"Case of State against Nara Chandrababu Naidu is, Naidu was a mastermind. Learned Senior Advocate, Mr. Mukul Rohtagi argued, since, at time of commission of offence, protective shield of Section 17A of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was not in force, Naidu could not claim benefits thereof. I do not accept. It has been already observed by me, […]
Read more "Accused No. 37, Mastermind Naidu"‘Acceptance of a Brief by a Lawyer’ in 2007 cannot be construed to reflect ‘bias’ or even a ‘likelihood of bias’ in 2023. There is an absence of proximity both in terms of time and subject matter. Writ Petitions filed before this Court raised concerns over precipitate decline in investor wealth and volatility in share […]
Read more "Adani Group of Companies"It is essential to emphasize, while Afjal did not enumerate any material facts regarding ‘irreversible consequences’, High Courts or Supreme Court are well empowered to take judicial notice of consequences. – Hon’ble Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, Afjal Ansari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, [Criminal Appeal No. 3838 of 2023]. Surya Kant J’s Judgment […]
Read more "The Nature of Judicial Power: Justice Dipankar Datta’s Definitive Dissent"Curative Petition (C) No. 44 of 2023 Review Petition (C) No. 704 of 2021 Civil Appeal No. 1599 of 2020 _____ Approach of Majority in N.N. Global 2 would render unstamped agreements void ab initio and not void. _____ We enter into contracts or agreements several times in our interactions with others. To hold an […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXV Answered Again: Doctrine of Separability of Arbitration Agreement"Vladimir Nabokov and T.S. Elliot eulogized Ulysses as a divine work of art. Virginia Woolf and Aldous Huxley criticized Ulysses for being technical and boring. It is celebrated by some, reviled by many others. Yet, its legacy continues. The Doctrine of Group of Companies. It provides, an Arbitration Agreement which is entered into by a Company within a Group […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXVIII Answered: Chloro Controls"A case for interference has been made out. The symbol for Indian National Rupee symbol [₹] was not in existence when purported ‘Memorandum of Agreement of Tenancy’ was signed. Minakshi Bala v Sudhir Kumar, (1994) 4 SCC 142: “Court cannot usurp functions of a Trial Court to delve into and decide upon respective merits.” Court […]
Read more "Minakshi Bala, (1994) 4 SCC 142"Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission invited applications from eligible candidates against 8 vacancies for a post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service. Out of total 8 vacancies, 6 were ‘existing vacancies’ and 2 were ‘anticipated vacancies’. The purpose of a ‘waiting list’ is only to fill shortfall of ‘clear and anticipated […]
Read more "The Rules of The Game Principle IX"One issue in Bank of India v. Aarya K. Babu, (2019) 8 SCC 587 was, whether a particular educational qualification made eligible after issue of recruitment notification could have been considered for purposes of recruitment. Court held, if there is any change in qualification criteria after notification is issued but before completion of selection process, […]
Read more "The Rules of The Game Principle VIII"State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh, (1999) 6 SCC 172 stated, Section 50 will come into play only in case of personal searches and not of bags. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar, (2005) 4 SCC 350 stated, a bag or briefcase under no circumstances can be treated as part of the body of […]
Read more "Section 50 of The NDPS Act"02-11-2018 – 15-05-2023 The rule flowing from the maxim ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ has been i) considered in Hari Shankar Jain, (1978) 4 SCC 16 and ii) explained in Mary Seward v. Owner of “Vera Cruz”, (1884) 10 AC 59, 68. Pharmacy Council of India v. Dr. S.K. Toshniwal Educational Trusts, [Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos. 87-101 of 2014]. […]
Read more "Random Collectibles of Justice M.R. Shah at Supreme Court"Division Bench of this Court in Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja, (2014) 7 SCC 547 had essentially outlawed Jallikattu and Bullock Cart Race. These bovine sports were held to be contrary to The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. A. Nagaraja found, bulls, to be non-suitable for being involved in any […]
Read more "The Nature of Judicial Power: Bovine Sports"I express my inability to agree with Justice Ajay Rastogi. The status of a person whether he belongs to SC or ST category depends on caste which he belongs to by birth, and such status would remain unchanged and would be static. The status of a person whether he belongs to OBC-NCL/MBC-NCL/EWS would depend upon […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXV: Dynamic Status"Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation was first introduced in State of Kerala v. K.G. Madhavan Pillai, (1988) 4 SCC 669. A blanket bar of Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation against a statute would cause great havoc. A blanket ban on Promissory Estoppel against a statute cannot be applicable to Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation. They are distinct. Doctrine […]
Read more "The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation V"
The Last Word 
You must be logged in to post a comment.