Skip to content

The Last Word

A Diversion for Lawyers and Others

  • Home
  • About

Categories

  • Alienation of Affection (18)
  • Arbitration (145)
  • Books of Interest (130)
  • Civil Procedure (162)
  • Condonation of Delay (50)
  • Conflicting Statutes (156)
  • Consumer Law (91)
  • Contract Law (237)
  • Corporate Law (64)
  • Criminal Law (505)
  • Doctrines (436)
  • Election Law (31)
  • Entertainment Features (222)
  • Family Law (88)
  • Gambling Law (13)
  • Intellectual Property Law (83)
  • Judges, Judgments & Lawyers (1,055)
  • Labour Law (146)
  • Law & Science (175)
  • Law of Writs (104)
  • Limitation Law (63)
  • Nature of Judicial Power (533)
  • Negotiable Instruments (38)
  • Phrases (654)
  • Poems, Scripts (174)
  • Primacy of Views (240)
  • Property Law (40)
  • Referred to Larger Bench (129)
  • Special Jurisdictions/Jurisprudence (423)
  • Statutory Interpretation (404)
  • X Supreme Court X (1,561)

Recent Posts

  • Fourth Forum
  • Dignity
  • Hearing
  • Sri Lanka to Switzerland
  • Seamless Chain of Support
  • Section 9 of The Arbitration Act II
  • The Rules of The Game Principle XI
  • Refuse to Recuse
  • Can
  • Tribal Way of Life
  • Tirupati Laddoo
  • Honourable Acquittal VII
  • Random Collectibles, Transformative
  • Apples and Oranges
  • Sparring for an Opening
  • Section 12(5) of The Arbitration Act VI
  • Architectural, Not Episodic
  • Tabulated Charts
  • Train No. 2102, Jnaneshwari Express
  • The Contra Proferentem Rule VIII
  • The Nature of Judicial Power: One Battle After Another
  • Dilatory Arbitrators
  • Transgender Protection Cell / The Revival of Ray XCVIII
  • Suit Battle
  • Section 138 Notice II

Archives

Top Posts & Pages

  • Order 18, Rule 17 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • Order 6, Rule 16 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • Functional Dead Lock
  • The Plea of Limitation XVII: Continuing Wrong
  • Caution for Lust in Hollywood
  • Writ Jurisdiction in Contractual Arena I
  • Order 21, Rule 11(3) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Blog Stats

  • 377,248

Enter your Email Address!

X Supreme Court X

Section 11 of the Arbitration Act I

The nature and scope of jurisdiction of the Chief Justice or his Designate, under Section 11 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been expounded upon by many. SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd., (2005) 8 SCC 618 has put beyond doubt, the Chief Justice, in performance of its role espoused by Section […]

Read more "Section 11 of the Arbitration Act I"

Posts navigation

Newer posts →
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Last Word
    • Join 106 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Last Word
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar