Dilly-Dally

The only purpose of entrusting work of adjudicating Disqualification Petitions to a Speaker/Chairman was to avoid dilly-dallying in Courts or the Election Commission’s office. The question we have to ask ourselves is, whether the trust which Parliament entrusted has been adhered to? Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu, 1992 Supp (2) 651 was not expected to anticipate, […]

Read more "Dilly-Dally"

Ratio Decidendi IV

Secunderabad Club v. CIT, 2023 INSC 736 had occasion to delineate how to cull out ratio decidendi and identify principles which have precedential value. Further, a simple test has been invoked by this Court. Professor Eugene Wambaugh’s ‘Inversion Test’ mandates, to determine whether a particular proposition of law is part of ratio decidendi, either that […]

Read more "Ratio Decidendi IV"

Spill the Beans

R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 2 SCR 417 is locus classicus on determining admissibility of a tape-recorded conversation. When this Court decided Yusufalli Esmail Nagree v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1968 SC 147 and R.M. Malkani, devices like tape-recorders and microphones were carefully placed in a space wherein conversations could be secretly recorded […]

Read more "Spill the Beans"

Ordinary Man

We observe a tendency on part of Members of Bar to rely upon a large number of decisions, whether relevant or irrelevant. Multiple decisions are cited on same proposition of law. This makes hearing time-consuming. Courts permit written submissions. Very long written submissions come on record. A high monetary stake should not result in unnecessarily […]

Read more "Ordinary Man"

Language of Courts II

“When you learn a language, you don’t just learn to speak and write a new language. You also learn to be open-minded, liberal, tolerant, kind and considerate towards all mankind.” Before language became a tool for learning, its earliest and primary purpose was, and will always remain to be, communication. Coming back to our case, […]

Read more "Language of Courts II"

Custodial Interrogation Evidence

Driver of Kashmir University-Ghulam Nabi Dar alleged, on 06.04.1990 at about 04.20 PM, Vice Chancellor-Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq and Personal Secretary-Abdul Gani Zargar were kidnapped by armed terrorists outside Sadarbal Gate. Subsequently, dead bodies of Dr. Mushir-ul- Haq and Abdul Gani Zargar were recovered on 10.04.1990. Investigation revealed, Hilal Beg, Chief Commander of Jammu & Kashmir Students […]

Read more "Custodial Interrogation Evidence"

Moral Turpitude IV

Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 enables ‘forfeiture of gratuity’, wholly or partially, if delinquent employee is terminated for any act which constitutes an offence involving ‘moral turpitude’, if offence is committed in course of his employment. The provision of ‘forfeiture of gratuity’ does not speak of a conviction in a criminal proceeding. […]

Read more "Moral Turpitude IV"

Compassionate Appointment VII

The idea of compassionate appointment is not to provide for endless compassion [I.G. (Karmik) v. Prahalad Mani Tripathi, (2007) 6 SCC 162]. Any appointment without considering financial condition of the family of a deceased is legally impermissible [Union of India v. Amrita Sinha, (2021) 20 SCC 695]. The right to apply cannot be exercised at […]

Read more "Compassionate Appointment VII"

Spirit of the Law

Justice S.R. Das pertinently observed in Rananjaya Singh v. Baijnath Singh, (1954) 2 SCC 314, “The spirit of the law may well be an elusive and unsafe guide and the supposed spirit can certainly not be given effect to in opposition to the plain language of the Sections of the Act.” In other words, the […]

Read more "Spirit of the Law"

Review of Death Penalty XLIII

“We may reiterate, therefore, the certificate required under Section 65B(4) is a condition precedent to admissibility of evidence by way of electronic record, as correctly held in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473.” Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 3 SCC 216 referred and Three-Judge Bench in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar […]

Read more "Review of Death Penalty XLIII"

Restitution of Conjugal Rights

Will a Husband, who secures a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, stand absolved of paying maintenance to his Wife if his Wife refuses to return to her matrimonial home? After having secured said restitution decree, Dinesh did nothing! He neither sought execution under Order XXI, Rule 32 CPC nor did he seek a divorce […]

Read more "Restitution of Conjugal Rights"

Carrying Drugs on Private Ships

Court is of view, a seized vehicle is not liable to confiscation if owner can prove, the seized vehicle was used by accused without his knowledge or connivance and he had taken all reasonable precautions against such use of the seized vehicle by accused. Court is of opinion, there is no specific bar/restriction under The […]

Read more "Carrying Drugs on Private Ships"

Section 52A of The NDPS Act

The evidence collected during course of investigation in a legal and proper manner and sought to be used in course of trial with regard to a seized contraband substance could not be simply brushed aside on ground of a procedural irregularity committed. Union of India v. Mohanlal, (2016) 3 SCC 379 nowhere held, non-compliance or […]

Read more "Section 52A of The NDPS Act"

Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage IV

After a few mediation sessions before Supreme Court Mediation Centre, Sandesh submitted before us, he was not interested in pursuing a mediated settlement before Supreme Court Mediation Centre. However, Rinku and Sandesh agreed to attempt a mediated settlement before a Retired Judge of this Court. Consequently, Retd. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat was appointed as a […]

Read more "Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage IV"