Skip to content

The Last Word

A Diversion for Lawyers and Others

  • Home
  • About

Categories

  • Alienation of Affection (18)
  • Arbitration (143)
  • Books of Interest (130)
  • Civil Procedure (162)
  • Condonation of Delay (50)
  • Conflicting Statutes (156)
  • Consumer Law (90)
  • Contract Law (236)
  • Corporate Law (64)
  • Criminal Law (501)
  • Doctrines (433)
  • Election Law (31)
  • Entertainment Features (220)
  • Family Law (88)
  • Gambling Law (13)
  • Intellectual Property Law (82)
  • Judges, Judgments & Lawyers (1,044)
  • Labour Law (144)
  • Law & Science (174)
  • Law of Writs (103)
  • Limitation Law (63)
  • Nature of Judicial Power (523)
  • Negotiable Instruments (38)
  • Phrases (647)
  • Poems, Scripts (170)
  • Primacy of Views (236)
  • Property Law (40)
  • Referred to Larger Bench (128)
  • Special Jurisdictions/Jurisprudence (418)
  • Statutory Interpretation (401)
  • X Supreme Court X (1,550)

Recent Posts

  • Honourable Acquittal VII
  • Random Collectibles, Transformative
  • Apples and Oranges
  • Sparring for an Opening
  • Section 12(5) of The Arbitration Act VI
  • Architectural, Not Episodic
  • Tabulated Charts
  • Train No. 2102, Jnaneshwari Express
  • The Contra Proferentem Rule VIII
  • The Nature of Judicial Power: One Battle After Another
  • Dilatory Arbitrators
  • Transgender Protection Cell / The Revival of Ray XCVIII
  • Suit Battle
  • Section 138 Notice II
  • How to be a Supreme but not Infallible Supreme Court Judge
  • Dr. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti
  • Leakage of Question Paper of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination
  • Intentionally, Voluntarily
  • The Baishakhi Principle
  • Consequential or Inconsequential Import
  • Women Officers
  • Where Eagles Dare
  • Dilly-Dally
  • Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts XV : Custodial Violence II
  • Ratio Decidendi IV

Archives

Top Posts & Pages

  • Order 18, Rule 17 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • Order 6, Rule 16 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • December 8, 1930
  • Misinterpretation of Uma Devi
  • Fraudulent Employment - Faustian Bargain
  • Judges with Colorful Lives: No. 10
  • Erroneous Judgment v. Perverse Judgment I

Blog Stats

  • 370,548

Enter your Email Address!

Statutory Interpretation

The Rare Case Where Section 42 of the Arbitration Act Fails

In the year 2000, the State of Maharashtra awarded a contract for some construction work to Atlanta Limited. Disputes borne out of the contract were to be decided through Arbitration. Recourse to a Court against an Arbitral Award may be made only by an application for setting aside such Award in accordance with Sub-Section (2) […]

Read more "The Rare Case Where Section 42 of the Arbitration Act Fails"

Posts navigation

Newer posts →
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Last Word
    • Join 105 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Last Word
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar