Don’t Mess with People from Allahabad

On 10.03.2015, Markandey Katju (MK) published two posts on his Facebook page. One called ‘Gandhi – A British Agent‘, the other referred to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose as an ‘Agent of Japanese Fascism’. On 11.03.2015, Rajya Sabha unanimously passed the following ‘resolution’: “This House expresses its unequivocal condemnation of the recent remarks of the Former Judge of the […]

Read more "Don’t Mess with People from Allahabad"

Section 8 of The Arbitration Act III

“In Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., (2006) 7 SCC 275 interpreting the expression “first statement on the substance of the dispute”, this Court held: “The expression “first statement on the substance of the dispute” contained in Section 8(1) of The 1996 Act must be contradistinguished with the expression “written statement”. It employs submission of the party […]

Read more "Section 8 of The Arbitration Act III"

Contemptuous Katju

Armed with 35 years of hindsight, Justice Bhagwati, in 2011, expressed regret for his 1976 Judgment upholding Prevention Detention during the Emergency. Justice Chandrachud did so in 1978 in case his chances of being CJI were blighted. Were these declarations simply a flourish to catch the public eye? Do Judges even concede they are wrong? […]

Read more "Contemptuous Katju"

Tender Law IV

“Recently in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., 2016 (8) SCALE 765 a Two-Judge Bench eloquently exposited… “We may add, the owner or the employer of a project, having authored the tender documents, is the best person to understand and appreciate its requirements and interpret its documents. Constitutional Courts must defer to […]

Read more "Tender Law IV"

Monsters-In-Law III

Appellant-Husband was treated cruelly by Respondent-Wife. There were repeated threats of suicide [Pankaj Mahajan v. Dimple, (2011) 12 SCC 1]; levelling of disgusting accusations of indecent familiarity with a person outside wedlock [Vijaykumar v. Neela, 2003 (6) SCC 334]. Both are acts of cruelty within the meaning of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Respondent-Wife wanted […]

Read more "Monsters-In-Law III"

Monsters-In-Law II

A ‘domestic violence‘ within the meaning of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is ‘gender neutral‘; physical abuse, verbal abuse, emotional abuse and economic abuse can all be by women against other women. “Even sexual abuse may, in a given fact circumstance, be by one woman on another.” SC in Hiralal Harsora […]

Read more "Monsters-In-Law II"