The Contra Proferentem Rule IV

“The common law rule of construction ‘verba chartarum fortius accipiuntur contra proferentem’ means that ambiguity in the wording of a policy is to be resolved against the party who prepared it. MacGillivray on Insurance Law, [9th ed., 1997] deals with the rule of Contra Proferentem as follows: “The Contra Proferentem rule of construction arises only […]

Read more "The Contra Proferentem Rule IV"

Arbitration Clauses in Trust Deeds

My Lord, Can a Trust Deed, including an Arbitration Clause, constitute an ‘Arbitration Agreement’ within the meaning of Sections 2(b) and 2(h) read with Section 7 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? No. “Though the case of Vijay Kumar Sharma, (2010) 2 SCC 486 dealt with the execution of a ‘Will’ whereas the case […]

Read more "Arbitration Clauses in Trust Deeds"

Tender Law II

The party issuing a tender (employer) ‘has the right to punctiliously and rigidly’ enforce the terms of the tender. Here is a wholesome principle that the Courts have been following for a very long time and which was articulated in Nazir Ahmad v. King Emperor, (1979) 3 SCC 489: “Where a power is given to […]

Read more "Tender Law II"

Referred to Larger Bench XI: Statutory Appeals to Supreme Court

My Lord, Is it permissible and advisable to provide Statutory Appeals directly to Supreme Court, from Orders of Tribunals, on issues not affecting National or Public Interest? “In an Article by Shri T.R. Andhyarujina [Former Solicitor General of India], ‘Restoring, Character and Stature of Supreme Court of India’, Learned Author states… Supreme Court of India […]

Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XI: Statutory Appeals to Supreme Court"

Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts V: Peaceful Protests of Kashmir

“It hardly needs elaboration that a distinguishing feature of any democracy is the space offered for legitimate dissent. One cherished and valuable aspect of political life in India is a tradition to express grievances through direct action or peaceful protest. Organized, non-violent protest marches were a key weapon in the struggle for Independence, and the […]

Read more "Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts V: Peaceful Protests of Kashmir"

Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts IV: Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati

Bl. Titus Brandsma courageously resisted Nazi ideology and died at Dachau in 1942. The Titus Brandsma Award recognizes a journalist who has made a major contribution to the struggle for human rights. Anto Akkara was conferred the Award in 2013 for having exposed the brutal persecution of Christians in India. In its Award Citation, The […]

Read more "Compensatory Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts IV: Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati"

Tender Law I

While authorities are given latitude in formulating tender conditions, Court has been consistent in requiring adherence to conditions once framed, and has entered into fairly detailed scrutiny of administrative decisions. “The law is settled that an essential condition of a tender has to be strictly complied with. In Poddar Steel Corporation, (1991) 3 SCC 273, […]

Read more "Tender Law I"

Article 136 and Criminal Appeals III

“The jurisdiction which this Court exercises under Article 136 has its own self-imposed restrictions. It is sufficient to refer to this Court’s decision reported in Ganga Kumar Srivastava v. State of Bihar, (2005) 6 SCC 211 where this Court after referring to various decisions has laid down certain principles for exercising the power of this […]

Read more "Article 136 and Criminal Appeals III"

The Plea of Limitation VII: Section 14 of The Limitation Act, 1963

Respondent entered into a contract for construction of a commercial complex. Certain disputes arose. Sole Arbitrator passed an Award on 11.11.2010. Both parties appeared before Arbitrator. Arbitrator did not find any justification to allow any claim of Respondent-Contractor. Respondent believed he could take a somersault. It propelled him to file an application under Section 11 […]

Read more "The Plea of Limitation VII: Section 14 of The Limitation Act, 1963"

Battle of the Articles II: 32/226

“The Court must necessarily abide the parameters which govern a nuanced exercise of judicial power. Hence, where an effort is made to bring issues of governance before the Court, the basic touchstone on which the invocation of jurisdiction must rest is whether the issue can be addressed within the framework of law or the Constitution. […]

Read more "Battle of the Articles II: 32/226"