Explanation 1 to Section 34(2)(b)(ii) of Arbitration Act, added through Amendment, 2015, specifies, an Arbitral Award is in conflict with public policy of India only if (i) making of Award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of Section 75 or Section 81; or (ii) it is in contravention with fundamental policy of […]
Read more "Most Basic Notions of Justice"We accept view taken by High Courts of Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, Bombay, Kerala, Madras and view expressed by High Court at Calcutta. Section 29A(4) requires interpretation. It states, where Arbitral Award is not made within specified period of 12 months [Section 29A(1)] or extended period of 6 months [Section 29A(3)], mandate of […]
Read more "Section 29A(4) of The Arbitration Act"There can be no doubt, it is not necessary to furnish copies of each and every document to which a casual or passing reference may be made in narration of facts and which are not relied upon by Detaining Authority. However, failure to furnish copies of such documents as are relied on by Detaining Authority […]
Read more "Preventive Detention Statute VI"Chand Diwan v. Jawaharlal Diwan, (1993) 3 SCC 406 squarely covers point. We find no ground to disbelieve, fact of her previous marriage was not concealed from her present husband. A bigamous marriage may be declared illegal. But, it cannot be said to be immoral so as to deny even right of alimony or maintenance […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXIX (Answered): Maintenance in Bigamy"For over 50 yrs., High Court has been disposing of Writ Petitions raising claims or challenges to exercise of powers or dereliction of duties under The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. The propensity and proclivity of 1971 Act to generate litigation are worrisome. The exasperation of High Court is understandable. Court […]
Read more "Assessment of Statute"Most minerals are spatially located in a few mineral rich states, namely, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan and West Bengal. Constitution is a living organic document and must be interpreted in that spirit [Saurabh Chaudri v. Union of India, (2003) 11 SCC 146 ; Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of […]
Read more "The Nature of Judicial Power: Typographical Errors"Haridas Das v. Usha Rani Banik, (2006) 4 SCC 78 while reiterating decisions in Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, (1979) 4 SCC 389 and Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury, (1995) 1 SCC 170 drew out narrow contours within which review jurisdiction of this Court had to be exercised and held, Order XLVII, […]
Read more "The Nature of Judicial Power: Powers of Review of Supreme Court II"What cannot be done directly, cannot be done indirectly. It is apt to refer to a decision of a Division Bench of Karnataka High Court in Nalini Sunder v. GV Sunder, AIR 2003 Kar 86. It was held, a party could not make out a case on basis of evidence for which he/she has laid […]
Read more "Forfeiture of Right to File Written Statement"A perusal of Section 307, IPC would make it clear, it really imbibes the true spirit of the maxim ‘culpae poena per esto’. It means ‘let the punishment be proportionate to the offence; let the punishment fit the crime.’ The second part of Section 307, IPC did not prescribe for imposition of punishment more than […]
Read more "Section 307, Indian Penal Code II"“It would be very wrong to say, under a particular statute, bail cannot be granted.” According to Police, Sheikh Javed Iqbal had confessed, he was engaged in illegal trade of supplying counterfeit Indian currency notes in Nepal. Sheikh Javed Iqbal was arrested on 23.02.2015. We are in July, 2024. 9 years have gone by. A […]
Read more "Bail for Sheikh Javed Iqbal and Ors."It is a fact, certain High Courts maintained a view, sentencing to undergo ‘imprisonment till rising of Court’ would be no sentence at all according to law. It cannot be said, imposing a sentence of ‘imprisonment till rising of Court’ is impermissible or an action amounting to evasion of statutory provisions. However, we have no […]
Read more "Flea-Bite"We are examining legality of arrest of Arvind Kejriwal on 21.03.2024. Gifford v. Kelson, (1943) 51 Man. R 120 accurately explains difference between “reasons to believe” and “suspicion”. “Suspicion” requires lower degree of satisfaction and does not amount to belief. An arrestee should be furnished “reasons to believe” to enable him to exercise his right […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXVIII: Necessity to Arrest"Arbitral Award made by Arbitral Tribunal on 30th June, 2022 was served on same day. In view of Section 12(1) of The Limitation Act, 1963, 30th June, 2022 will have to be excluded while computing limitation period. Thus, in effect, period of limitation started running on 1st July, 2022, period of limitation being of 3 […]
Read more "Section 34(3) of The Arbitration Act III"Appellate Court under Section 37 is to decide, whether jurisdiction under Section 34 has been exercised rightly or wrongly. As observed, scope of interference under Section 34 is very narrow; jurisdiction under Section 37 is narrower [UHL Power Company Limited v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2022) 4 SCC 116]. There is no statutory embargo on […]
Read more "Section 37 of The Arbitration Act IV"Nachiketa Walhekar v. Central Board of Film Certification, (2018) 1 SCC 778 held, Court will be extremely slow to restrain creative works, once Board had approved exhibition. The context, intention and overall message must be considered before protection of free speech is lifted. We have heard Sanjoy Ghose, Senior Counsel and Jai Anant Dehadrai, Counsel […]
Read more "Able Disable All People Together II"“Let justice be done though the heavens fall” In early hours of 19/05/2024 a ghastly incident killed 2 young individuals in Pune and cause for same happened to be a Porsche rashly driven by Master X, a child in conflict with law. On very same day, he came to be released on bail. Juvenile Justice […]
Read more "Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum, Again"Arbitrator does not do pro bono work. For him, it is a professional assignment. Arbitrator who accepts an appointment cannot say, he will not fix a meeting to conduct Arbitral Proceedings or a hearing date unless parties request him to do so. It is duty of an Arbitral Tribunal to do so. Section 32 of […]
Read more "Section 32 of The Arbitration Act"Our research indicates, there is no authoritative pronouncement of this Court on this issue. _____ “Government will be well-advised to make suitable amendments.” – Anwar Ahmad v. State of U.P., AIR 1976 SC 680. Section 102(3), CrPC came by way of an amendment only in 1978. It becomes necessary to understand, meaning of the expression […]
Read more "Forthwith"State of Kerala v. V.R. Kalliyanikutty, (1999) 3 SCC 657 did not dispute, a statute of limitation only bars a remedy and does not extinguish a debt. It would also be apposite to point out, recently, K.C. Ninan v. Kerala State Electricity Board, 2023 INSC 560 noticed V.R. Kalliyanikutty and concluded, a statute of limitation […]
Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XXXVII: Limitation and Debt"Many times, Parents including Close Relatives of a Wife make a mountain out of a mole. No sooner it reaches Police, fair chances of reconciliation would get destroyed. The foundation of a sound marriage is tolerance, adjustment and respecting one another. Tolerance to each other’s fault to a certain bearable extent has to be inherent […]
Read more "Criminal Proceedings in Marriages"
The Last Word 
You must be logged in to post a comment.