Trusts Not Consumers

My Lord, Complaint by a Trust under The Consumer Protection Act, 1986? “A reading of the definition of the words ‘complaint’, ‘complainant’ and ‘consumer’ makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a ‘complaint’ could be made. It is clear […]

Read more "Trusts Not Consumers"

Rudespotted: Vikram Raghavan

George H. Gadbois, Jr., chronicler of 93 Judges of Supreme Court of India, had this to say once: “When I first wrote to Justice A N Ray requesting an interview, I included a couple of articles I had published earlier. This enabled him to see that I was rather well-informed about him and the Court. […]

Read more "Rudespotted: Vikram Raghavan"

1+3 Judges Disagree With Justice Chelameswar on ‘Cheating Students’

Madhya Pradesh Professional Examination Board ridded certain students of their results, awarded in their professional MBBS course, on the ground, they had gained admission to the course by resorting to unfair means. Hon’ble Justice Chelameswar (Presiding Judge) had expressed the view, complete justice in the matter would be rendered, if the qualifications successfully acquired by […]

Read more "1+3 Judges Disagree With Justice Chelameswar on ‘Cheating Students’"

The Advanced Age of Sushil Ansal

On March 05, 2014 Hon’ble Justice T.S Thakur, not yet CJI, observed, “cynical Chalta Hai Attitude… more often than not costs society dearly in man-made tragedies” [(2014) 6 SCC 173]. The price of Sushil Ansal’s ‘Chalta Hai Attitude’ was pegged at Rs. 30 Crores [(2015) 10 SCC 359]. That is merely 18 Crores more than what a […]

Read more "The Advanced Age of Sushil Ansal"

Referred to Larger Bench XII: Doctrine of Relation Back in Admissions

My Lord, Can grant of monetary compensation be considered as the sole and adequate remedy for a student who has been deprived of admission, despite he or she being meritorious, vigilant and diligent, because of lapses committed either by the counselling authority or the administrating authority intrinsically connected with the process of admission? “It is […]

Read more "Referred to Larger Bench XII: Doctrine of Relation Back in Admissions"

An Unsuitable Boy

This blog has previously carried content on K3G here and here. I had the chance to read the biography of its Director, Karan Johar, recently. Here is [some of] what caught my interest… _____ I’ve had two unrequited love situations in my life. One in my twenties and one in my thirties where I’d loved […]

Read more "An Unsuitable Boy"

Rudespotted: Vinay Kesari

Third-Rung Lawyers [i.e., those in the age-bracket of 28-37] are an active lot on Twitter. Key figures are controlling opinion on a variety of issues. It is expected some of them shall be, with time, legitimate Partners or credited Senior Advocates or hopeful Don Salves. There is a benefit in knowing them. For if they […]

Read more "Rudespotted: Vinay Kesari"

The Plea of Limitation IX: Express Exclusion of Section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963

The Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003  81. Revision to High Court – (1) Any dealer or other person, who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, or the Commissioner may, within sixty days after being notified of the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, file a revision to the High Court; and the […]

Read more "The Plea of Limitation IX: Express Exclusion of Section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963"

Fraudulent Decrees

“It is a settled proposition of law that a decree obtained by playing fraud on Court is a nullity and that such a decree could be challenged at any time in any proceedings. This proposition is certainly not in dispute. Learned Counsel also placed reliance on Union of India v. Ramesh Gandhi, (2012) 1 SCC […]

Read more "Fraudulent Decrees"

Don’t Mess with People from Allahabad

On 10.03.2015, Markandey Katju (MK) published two posts on his Facebook page. One called ‘Gandhi – A British Agent‘, the other referred to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose as an ‘Agent of Japanese Fascism’. On 11.03.2015, Rajya Sabha unanimously passed the following ‘resolution’: “This House expresses its unequivocal condemnation of the recent remarks of the Former Judge of the […]

Read more "Don’t Mess with People from Allahabad"

Section 8 of The Arbitration Act III

“In Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., (2006) 7 SCC 275 interpreting the expression “first statement on the substance of the dispute”, this Court held: “The expression “first statement on the substance of the dispute” contained in Section 8(1) of The 1996 Act must be contradistinguished with the expression “written statement”. It employs submission of the party […]

Read more "Section 8 of The Arbitration Act III"