Divorce v. Judicial Separation

My Lord, Decree for Divorce v. Decree for Judicial Separation? “A 3-Judge Bench in Jeet Singh, (1993) 1 SCC 325 ruled that, a Decree or an Order for Judicial Separation permits the Parties to live apart. There would be no obligation for either Party to cohabit with the other; mutual rights and obligations arising out […]

Read more "Divorce v. Judicial Separation"

Moral Misconduct of an Arbitrator I

Under Section 30(a) of The 1940 Arbitration Act, an Arbitral Award can be set side if the Arbitrator has “misconducted himself or the proceedings”. In K.P. Poulose, (1975) 2 SCC 236 it was held, “misconduct under Section 30(a) has not a connotation of moral lapse. It comprises legal misconduct which is complete if the Arbitrator on […]

Read more "Moral Misconduct of an Arbitrator I"

Mesmeric Gambling Instinct

“It is a common case, lottery is a species of gambling. Gambling is considered as a pernicious vice by all civilized societies from time immemorial. Experience has shown, common forms of gambling are comparatively innocuous when placed in contrast with widespread pestilence of lotteries. The former are confined to a few persons and places. The […]

Read more "Mesmeric Gambling Instinct"

The Kesavananda Bench

Knowing the Judge, is the last refinement an Advocate can hope for. Gadbois Sir shall be remembered forever for his research on Judges of Supreme Court of India. What a book! I would not have realized… _____ The NJAC Judgment is still running its course and at this juncture of history it is difficult to […]

Read more "The Kesavananda Bench"

Disjunctive, Conjunctive I

“We are conscious of the principle that the word ‘or’ is normally disjunctive and ‘and’ is normally conjunctive. However, there may be circumstances where these words are to be read as vice-versa to give effect to manifest intention of Legislature as disclosed from the context. Of course, these two words normally ‘or’ and ‘and’ are […]

Read more "Disjunctive, Conjunctive I"

Condonation of Delay IV: 1186

“There is inordinate delay of 1186 days in filing the SLPs.” “There is gross delay of almost 3 1/2 years in challenging the Judgment rendered in the Writ Appeal and no explanation much less cogent explanation has been given by the Appellant.” “There is no reason to condone the delay.” – Hon’ble Justice C. Nagappan, […]

Read more "Condonation of Delay IV: 1186"

NJAC Judgment V: Kurian Joseph J

Hon’ble Justice Kurian Joseph has been in news: first, because of his tiff with CJI Dattu and second, for his contribution in Yakub Memon. Gold fish have no hiding place. And therefore, ‘briefest’ Judgment? “Historical, Textual, Structural, Prudential, Doctrinal, Episodic, Ethical” arguments aside, “there cannot be any legal sense of an issue, which does not […]

Read more "NJAC Judgment V: Kurian Joseph J"

NJAC Judgment II: Jasti Chelameswar J

Honourable. Honourable. Honourable. Hon’ble Justice Altamas Kabir has shared the Bench with Hon’ble Justice J. Chelameswar for days on end. Hon’ble Justice Altamas Kabir was sworn in at the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court on the same day as Hon’ble Justice Ruma Pal. They are friends. It is widely rumored, Hon’ble Justice Ruma Pal facilitated Hon’ble […]

Read more "NJAC Judgment II: Jasti Chelameswar J"

Sixteen Going On Seventeen

“You wait, little girl, on an empty stage For fate to turn the light on Your life, little girl, is an empty page That men will want to write on You are sixteen going on seventeen Baby, it’s time to think Better beware, be canny and careful Baby, you’re on the brink.” Oscar Hammerstein II, […]

Read more "Sixteen Going On Seventeen"

Stale Claims Before Writ Court

“Writ Court while deciding a Writ Petition is required to remain alive to the nature of the claim and the unexplained delay on the part of the Writ Petitioner. Stale claims are not to be adjudicated unless non-interference would cause grave injustice. In the case at hand, the employee was dismissed from service in the […]

Read more "Stale Claims Before Writ Court"

4 Grams of Heroin

My Lord, If 4 gms. of Heroin is recovered from an Accused, it would amount to a “small quantity”; but when the same 4 gms. is mixed with 50 kgs. of Powdered Sugar, would it be considered a “commercial quantity”? “In the mixture of a narcotic drug or a psychotropic substance with one or more […]

Read more "4 Grams of Heroin"