Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus

“It is a well settled position of law, testimony of a witness cannot be discarded in toto merely due to presence of embellishments or exaggerations. Doctrine of ‘falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’, which means ‘false in one thing, false in everything’ has been held to be inapplicable in Indian scenario, where tendency to exaggerate […]

Read more "Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus"

Reasonable Restriction II

Rewarded with the presence of Justice A.N. Ray, Himat Lal K. Shah, (1973) 1 SCC 227 held:  “Public meeting in open spaces and public streets forms part of the tradition of our national life. In the pre-Independence days such meetings have been held in open spaces and public streets and the people have come to regard […]

Read more "Reasonable Restriction II"

The Writ of Quo Warranto I

“Writ of Quo Warranto cannot be issued on basis of assumptions, inferences or suspicion regarding factum of fulfillment of eligibility criteria. Being an extraordinary power, ordinarily such a Writ ought to be issued only on basis of indisputable facts leading to a singular conclusion – incumbent was in fact or in law disqualified to occupy […]

Read more "The Writ of Quo Warranto I"

The Last Word on Padmaavat

Witnessing Padmaavat unfold on screen, on its first day of release, was unique, especially since your smart phone kept reminding you of persistent violence. The casual viewer may have even ignored a woman threatening to immolate herself or even a policemen who stood guard, but the skeptic whispered if a riot broke out… on which […]

Read more "The Last Word on Padmaavat"

Section 499, Indian Penal Code III

I had earlier defended Explanation 1 to Section 499 and Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, [Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 184 of 2014], in the wake of strong arguments that, the legal regime of defamation as set out in Sections 499 and 500 is unconstitutional. Legislature in its wisdom has still not thought it appropriate to abolish […]

Read more "Section 499, Indian Penal Code III"

Jactitation of Marriage

Jactitation of marriage means persistent boasting of a marriage, falsely alleged to have taken place. The suit prays for a decree of perpetual silence on the subject. This is the only case in which a matrimonial suit can, as of right, be proceeded without prima facie proof of a marriage de facto. For the object […]

Read more "Jactitation of Marriage"

Kuttikanam / Seigniorage

In George Leslie v. State of Kerala, AIR 1970 Ker 21 the term ‘Kuttikanam’ was explained. It was held, ‘Kuttikanam’ is neither a fee nor a tax. A tax or fee is levied in the exercise of sovereign power. ‘Kuttikanam’ means Government’s share of the value of the reserved trees. It was further held by Mathew […]

Read more "Kuttikanam / Seigniorage"

Implied Exclusion of Part I of The Arbitration Act IV: The Shashoua Principle

The Shashoua Principle [Roger Shashoua v. Mukesh Sharma, 2009 EWHC 957 (Comm)] “When there is an express designation of the Arbitration venue as London and no designation of any alternative place as seat, combined with a supranational body of rules [i.e. ICC] governing the Arbitration and no other significant contrary indicia, the inexorable conclusion is, […]

Read more "Implied Exclusion of Part I of The Arbitration Act IV: The Shashoua Principle"

Legal Fiction

Lon Luvois Fuller defined classic legal fiction as “either (1) a statement propounded with a complete or partial consciousness of its falsity, or (2) a false statement recognized as having utility.” The common law was rife with fictions: a plaintiff who had bailed his chattel under a bailment terminable at his will was deemed to […]

Read more "Legal Fiction"

Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum

“The Latin maxim ‘fiat justitia ruat caelum’ is what first comes to mind on a reading of Article 142 – let justice be done though the heavens fall. This maxim was quoted by Lord Mansfield in R. v. Wilkes, (1770) 4 Burr 2527: (1558-1774) All ER Rep. 570. The Article gives a very wide power […]

Read more "Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum"

Misconduct

‘Misconduct’ has been defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Edn.) at pg. 999: “A transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction from duty, unlawful behaviour, wilful in character, improper or wrong behaviour, its synonyms are misdemeanour, misdeed, misbehaviour, delinquency, impropriety, mismanagement, offence, but not negligence or carelessness.” P. […]

Read more "Misconduct"

Public Policy

“The phrase ‘public policy’ is not capable of precise definition. In P. Rathinam, (1994) 3 SCC 394 it was observed: “The concept of ‘public policy’ is, however, illusive, varying and uncertain. It has also been described as ‘untrustworthy guide’, ‘unruly horse’ et cetera.” Broadly it will mean what is in the larger interest of the […]

Read more "Public Policy"

Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit

“There cannot be an iota of doubt that no prejudice shall be caused to anyone due to the fault of the Court, but it is to be seen in what situations the Court can invoke the maxim ‘actus curiae neminem gravabit’. In this regard, we may usefully refer to a passage from Kalabharati Advertising, (2010) […]

Read more "Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit"