Look, T.M.A. Pai Again

Any attempt at interpretation of a long line of cases proves to be tiresome. Modern Dental College and Research Centre v. State of Madhya Pradesh, [Civil Appeal No. 4060 of 2009], delivered on 02.05.2016, provides a brave summary. Accept it with abundant caution. 5 Judges have no jurisdiction to interpret 7 or 11 erstwhile Lords. The […]

Read more "Look, T.M.A. Pai Again"

Dispute on Matrimonial Status

“Under Section 7(1), Explanation (b) of The Family Courts Act, 1984 (“Act”) a suit or a proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of both marriage and matrimonial status of a person is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court, since under Section 8 all those jurisdictions covered under Section 7 are excluded […]

Read more "Dispute on Matrimonial Status"

75 LAKHS FOR NALSA

One of the examples cited as an abuse of the process of Court is re-litigation. It is contrary to justice and public policy for a party to re-litigate the same issue which has already been tried and decided earlier against him. Recently, Messer Holdings Ltd. v. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia, [Special Leave Petition (Civil) 33429 of […]

Read more "75 LAKHS FOR NALSA"

Knickeratti

Truth be told, both Chetan Bhagat [@chetan_bhagat] and Dushyant Arora [@atti_cus] wrote boring posts – nothing I have not read before. Chetan wrote first. He used that advantage. It is not appropriate for a National-Figure to berate an Upcoming Lawyer. Some of us, including Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde, were concerned. At the Near Stroke of Midnight: Thus, […]

Read more "Knickeratti"

Referred to Larger Bench VIII: Sections 3 & 4, The Central Excise Act, 1944

“Two Coordinate Benches (Three Judges)” have taken what would appear to be contrary views with regard to purport and effect and the interconnection between Section 3 and 4 of The Central Excise Act, 1944. The First Coordinate Bench in Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd., (1984) 1 SCC 467 comprised of Hon’ble Judges […]

Read more "Referred to Larger Bench VIII: Sections 3 & 4, The Central Excise Act, 1944"

Curse of NEET, 2016

Four notifications, two dated 21.12.2010 and two dated 31.05.2012, issued by Medical Council of India and Dental Council of India, were challenged in CMC, Vellore v. Union of India, (2014) 2 SCC 305. CJI Altamas Kabir held, the notifications were ultra vires the provisions of Articles 19(1)(g), 25, 26(a), 29(1) and 30(1). Hon’ble Justice Anil […]

Read more "Curse of NEET, 2016"

D for Dayan, D for David

“It was a scorching summer day on 31st May, when the NIA sleuths gathered in the chambers of Gopal Subramanian, the Attorney General of India. He had just returned from the US where he had spent hours discussing the David Headley issue with the US Attorney General, Eric Holder… Behera spoke, ‘We will be leaving […]

Read more "D for Dayan, D for David"

Dura Lex Sed Lex

It is a settled legal proposition, law of limitation may harshly affect a particular party but it has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes. A result flowing from a statutory provision is never an evil. Court has no power to ignore that provision to relieve what it considers a […]

Read more "Dura Lex Sed Lex"

A Good Samaritan Law

There is a need to build confidence to help road accident victims. Good Samaritans fear of legal consequences, involvement in litigation and repeated visits to Police Station. There is a need to provide certain incentives to Good Samaritans. There is also a dire need to enact a Good Samaritan Law. Ministry of Road Transport and […]

Read more "A Good Samaritan Law"

The Proviso I

“It needs no special emphasis to mention, provisos can serve various purposes. Hidayatullah, J had observed, a proviso is generally added to an enactment to qualify or create an exception to what is in the enactment, and the proviso is not interpreted as stating a general rule. Further, except for instances dealt within the proviso, the […]

Read more "The Proviso I"

Referred to Larger Bench VII: Chapter III-A, The Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961

In Ranjit Narayan Haksar v. Surendra Verma, 1995 MPLJ 21 a Division Bench of High Court of Madhya Pradesh held, an employee, retired from its service to Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, was entitled to maintain an Eviction Petition under Chapter III-A of The Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. SC affirmed the reasoning. […]

Read more "Referred to Larger Bench VII: Chapter III-A, The Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961"

Power Coupled With Duty II

Several statutes confer power on authorities and officers to be exercised by them at their discretion and they are couched in permissive language, such as, “it may be lawful”, “it may be permissible”, “it may be open to do”, et cetera. But in certain situations, such power is coupled with duty and must be exercised. […]

Read more "Power Coupled With Duty II"